I just finished reading Emma by Jane Austen. It was a good read and in truth was not as nearly boring as the only other book I’ve read by Austen, Pride and Prejudice. I would in truth re-title Emma with the subtitle, “the humbling of Miss Woodhouse.” Because in truth the main character starts off as someone you don’t really like and then morphs into a far less conceited and well-adjusted person by the end. What I think makes it superior to Pride in Prejudice (P/P)? Austen uses the omnipresent narrator a lot more effective way in this book. For example in P/P we are cheering for the main characters, since most it's the most stereotypical Austen novel; to get a man. Where as the character of Emma is usually messing something up or really doesn’t seem to be aware of what’s really going on. In fact at points I found myself wishing she was saying and doing the exact opposite of what she does. Not having the author always on the side of chief protagonists really made it a much more enjoyable read because it makes it a much more complex story.
I always take issue with the chief topic of Jane Austen novels; MUST GET A MAN! Maybe some might take issue with me editorializing about Austen’s subject matter, being a man who has voluntarily 'subjected himself' to an Austen novel. But honestly I found the main aim of the books rather tiresome and Emma took me longer to read then most books of the same length simply because it felt like I was reading antiquated cattiness. It forced me to put it down out of boredom more then once, but the quality of the writing always made me come back to it.
Having not read any Austen since high school, I was also struck by how little physical description there is. The scenes of the conversations that are main staple of the book are very rarely given little more than one or two sentence descriptions. Most books want you to know the scene that the characters are currently finding themselves, but Austen’s emphasis is entirely on the conversation and social context. There isn’t even a real lengthy description of what the main characters even look like. I might of missed it but I don’t think it even states what color Emma’s hair is; physical description wasn’t that important the author. I don’t really remember ever reading a book so lopsided toward conversation before, in terms of the narrative it sort of jumpy and almost like a play.
I guess I just don’t understand Austen’s lasting appeal. In the historical forward to the book, my edition stated that Austen’s novels have been in almost continuously published since her death. In truth I guess I just don’t understand why people, seem to enjoy them so much. The writing is great, but the subject matter as I said previously subtracts from the writing. Though I suppose for that very reason I have trouble with them is the reason a lot of people really like them. I don’t see myself scrounging the bookshelves for another round of Austen, but all in all I enjoyed Emma.
I always take issue with the chief topic of Jane Austen novels; MUST GET A MAN! Maybe some might take issue with me editorializing about Austen’s subject matter, being a man who has voluntarily 'subjected himself' to an Austen novel. But honestly I found the main aim of the books rather tiresome and Emma took me longer to read then most books of the same length simply because it felt like I was reading antiquated cattiness. It forced me to put it down out of boredom more then once, but the quality of the writing always made me come back to it.
Having not read any Austen since high school, I was also struck by how little physical description there is. The scenes of the conversations that are main staple of the book are very rarely given little more than one or two sentence descriptions. Most books want you to know the scene that the characters are currently finding themselves, but Austen’s emphasis is entirely on the conversation and social context. There isn’t even a real lengthy description of what the main characters even look like. I might of missed it but I don’t think it even states what color Emma’s hair is; physical description wasn’t that important the author. I don’t really remember ever reading a book so lopsided toward conversation before, in terms of the narrative it sort of jumpy and almost like a play.
I guess I just don’t understand Austen’s lasting appeal. In the historical forward to the book, my edition stated that Austen’s novels have been in almost continuously published since her death. In truth I guess I just don’t understand why people, seem to enjoy them so much. The writing is great, but the subject matter as I said previously subtracts from the writing. Though I suppose for that very reason I have trouble with them is the reason a lot of people really like them. I don’t see myself scrounging the bookshelves for another round of Austen, but all in all I enjoyed Emma.
No comments:
Post a Comment